Coaching Theories and Models Free Essay Example, 1000 words

Having looked at the two theories, let’s now look at how the two theories contrast. Several similarities are evident from both theories. Firstly, there is a common position that the theories do lay a strong emphasis on performance. The essence of having an open ended approach in the contingency model is geared towards helping the manager to customize the needs of the employee to the coaching process so that they become more productive. On the other hand, the GROW approach takes into perspective the need to achieve goals; this is the reason why this theory too lays a strong emphasis on performance. Secondly, in both models the employee is not approached on what they should be doing but the focus is more on what they can do so that they can achieve the desirable futuristic results. The models do not look at the past in order in promote the future, but they mainly focus in the present and the future (Landsberg, 2003). Thirdly, they provide that the leader should be at a position of clarifying decisions to the employee. We will write a custom essay sample on Coaching Theories and Models or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page The coaching through the GROW model is based on the need to achieve specified goals while on the other hand, the contingency model is geared towards motivating the employees to achieving personal freedom while being coached to exhibit performance (Lapp & Carr, 2008). The contingency model fits perfectly on occasions where there is much respect between the coach and the employee. The respect makes the employee to be coached systematically while they act under their own discretion. Since they demonstrate respect to the coach, they will ensure that they meet what the coach requires of them. Another instance where this theory may be applicable is in any situation where the form of leadership of the organization is highly democratic or any other democratic scenarios.